City of Ankeny, School District Opt Out of Proposed $78.3 Million Sports Complex
In a joint press release issued by the city and school district today, both entities announced they will not contribute funding to the proposed 150-acre complex.
After reviewing the plans for a proposed 150-acre, $78.3 million sports complex, both the city of Ankeny and the Ankeny Community School District announced this afternoon they will not provide funding for the project.
The release stated both entities feel it is in the best interest of Ankeny taxpayers that private funding be pursued to construct, manage and operate the complex.
Here's our coverage of Sunday night's town meeting on the project: Public Forum for Proposed Ankeny Sports Complex Draws Many Questions from Residents
This decision comes after months of planning by project creators CK Land Development and the Sports Facility Advisory Group of Clearwater, Fla.
Project developers were asking the city and school school district to consider a 20-year leasing option to finance the project. The leasing option meant both entities would have contributed about $2.1 million each per year toward the project's capital costs.
According to the project's comprehensive plan, operational costs for the facility were slated to break even four or five years after its completion. In year five, revenue from the facility was expected to start reducing the facility cost over and above the lease payment.
All revenue associated with the facility was to go back to the city and school district.
Clark Kramme, an Ankeny resident who, along with his brother, Mark, wants to build the complex to be used by multiple entities in the community, including the city and school district.
The sports complex would feature commercial properties on the east side of Interstate Highway 35 along First Street. It also would include a football stadium, competition pool, and both indoor and outdoor complexes.
“(This) will contribute $30 million to the local economy just from the facility, 240,000 people will be using it and 90,000 of those will be from out-of-state,” Kramme told the school board at its May 24 meeting. “People from all over town have been asking me about it and want to support this project.”
Kramme also said the project has garnered the support of the Ankeny Booster Club and the Ankeny Parents Association.
The joint release said the city and the school often work together on public-private projects to serve the needs of residents, but both entities believe the impact of this project on taxpayers would be "burdensome and unacceptable."
Stick with Ankeny Patch for more on this story.
Kay Anderson
12:44 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Another mistake on Ankeny's part.............
Scott Koch
1:12 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Like the project, hate the project, undecided but wish to know more about the project it shouldn't matter - this should've been brought forth to the public to see if they want the project, could afford the project, would be willing to sacrifice "x" or etc. Or maybe the public says, what about revenue stream "x", what if we voted on $1 million vs $2.1 or $2.8, what revenue is the booster club currently missing out on, what programming is the city currently missing out on (last time I checked they don't have a pool or indoor facilities of their own to program year-round and thus generate revenue).
Now that we've been forced to move on, We should all ask, what project do you have that has a study behind it, by a company that's both accepted and turned down other projects, which states a $30 million economic impact that would positively effect everyone in the community and provides facilities that aren't 40 years old and not up to code.
http://ankeny.schoolfusion.us/modules/cms/pages.phtml?pageid=64632
http://www.ci.ankeny.ia.us/Index.aspx?page=173
Jim Zupan
2:49 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Well Ankeny hasn't lost one of it's small town charms. It still plays small town politics. Our leaders short sightedness has cost us before, and is costing us now. They will cost us again. Count on it. i guess we can spend our tax dollars fixing up our old facilities. On a side note, there are probably 4, or 5 counting bobbi bentz, happy patch readers...Bobbi you may have gained billiy's vote but you won't get mine...just using a little common sense myself. It never amazes me how politicians, past present, and future will say what they think people want to hear...I think they may be wrong this time.
Scott Miller
4:25 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Personally I believe this is a sad day for Ankeny. And William before you disagree with me it's not that I'm upset this complex fall flat. I have no money in it, I don't own land around it nor do I have or plan to get into franchising a McDonalds, Subway or Yogurt shop that could've gone in. I'm saddened because of our school board & city council decided something for the public verses letting the public decide. I'm saddended because at least in this project there was a revenue stream.
Well, I'm off to pick up my children & go to the basketball courts at the schools I can't get into after 3:30pm nor in the summer. Then might take them to the swimming pool they can't get into & use, oops can't dive into the pool either because it doesn't meet code. Maybe we'll go to the football stadium next door since it doesn't ever seen to be used. I thought about buying something at the concession stand but I'm pretty sure the health inspector would shut it down so I'll just gaze at the 750 seats on the visiting side that either Ankeny High or Ankeny Cenntenial will have to use in 2013.
My night gets even more fun when I take my kids to ball practise on the few fields the city offers thus we can only practise 1 day/week. After I pick them up around 8pm, since there is limited time I'll try to get them settled in before going back out to use the pool I still can't get into nor dive into but hey, the creaking of the 40 yr old stadium sounds beautiful along side the birds!
William
6:24 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
There is an easy solution to your problems, Scott. Get private investors to build the sports complex. They invest the money and reap the profits. They develop the area and attract the food franchises, hotels and other businesses that are sure to build there. You and your kids get to use the facilities, enjoy the french fries and ice cream, and the investors make money. The revenue pours into Ankeny and everyone wins, right?
Scott Miller
11:00 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
William you list one of my concerns I've had all along. The stadium is a school district or municipal building, correct? The swimming pool in most communities falls into the same category. Elementaries, well those are a given. So explain to me how & why would a private investor build a municipal building? They can't. You also obviously weren't at the town hall meeting, thus you didn't hear that stadiums & pools don't make money. Yep, they don't make money. Then whey was Mr. Kramme getting involved, to make money you say?
Well first Mr. Kramme wouldn't have been an owner in the project, which we've covered. He could've made money but only if commerical were developed; then again we'd all benefit from that because of increased commerical taxes gained.
What concerns me, and William you hit it on the head, too many people think a private investor will build a stadium or a pool. Think of our neighbors, all were bonded stadiums, pools or other athletic facilities. The bond financing & foundation also needed a municipal component, not a private one.
Mr. Kramme might still build the indoor complex, which might rent out space to Parks & Rec for their programming. But that still doesn't help the school district and that isn't a revenue stream to the city.
Blaine, MN; the National Training Center; Hummer Park in Topeka; Boo Williams in Virgina; Middle School in Indianola all had city, county, state and/or school district help. All are unique projects; just like this.
Charlotte G.
2:16 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Scott, yes, a sad day for Ankeny, again. Going forward with this growth. But, your sad day comment, well, said here for far too long. Thanks for trying to propose a solution. But, how you finally try to accept defeat, well, just accept that defeat. I know the feeling, but not from the sports side, only, as you so clearly represent. A 40 yr. old stadium, well, just wait. Can it ever possibly be refurbished to satisfy old, new, and newer interests, still, such as yours, maybe? Artificial turf there, on that playing field, being finally laid? Is this a possibility?
Scott Miller
9:43 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Charlotte I'm not quite sure you think I am but I wasn't defeated. I don't have a stake in the process, I don't own land and I wouldn't profit off this project other than the directly like any other Ankeny residents through increased Booster Club money that would decrease school district needs and increased tax revenue flowing into the city through visitors coming to our town that currently aren't OR by keeping money here that is currently being spent elsewhere because Ankeny can't host certain CIML events, larger CIML events or (yes) clubs can't host large events.
Was the project I was in favor for defeated, I guess so; though I'm curious how and who actually made those comments. Does anything know who that was? Did they vote as a board and a council? If you know where that information is located please post.
Scott Miller
9:50 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Charlotte, great questions about the stadium. Yes, I think adding turf would be a great addition to the stadium. Pretty much everyone else in the CIML, let along surrounding communities has it since it provides for longer and more flexible use so yeah, great idea.
Here's where the issue and large dollar amounts come into play. The stadium doesn't meet code and until it's touched, doesn't "have to". However, if one does some research or from what I was told was stated at the meeting by SFA, once something even remotely small starts to get touched on that stadium, then the modern day codes come into play and the stadium has to comply - which means millions of dollars. The parking lot is also tiny and the visitor side is rediculous. Which to some might be okay, ha! However please remember, either Ankey High or Ankeny Centennial will be a "visitor" at some point and more importantly, we should want the booster club to make as much money as possible at ALL events. The booster club distributes money back to the school and then to all sports, thus decreasing the need from the overall school district budget. We should want the booster club to succeed and right now there are severe limitations.
So Charlotte yes, this project was defeated, but I'm still curious how and look forward to information related to my questions in the previous posts.
Tony Carroll
4:55 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
I want to clarify what was stated at the end of this article. I signed a document stated that I supported that it be brought to the board in a public forum for public discussion. I never signed a document stating I supported the project as it was written. I agreed that it should have been discussed in a board meeting not just the open to the public minutes. I don't like things being put out of context. We had Clark make changes to what we signed for him for that reason.
Kurt B.
5:36 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
It seems like the 2.1 million for 20 years did not project a comfortable feeling. Plus, it doesn't seem like there was any real promise for reducing the local property taxes - they are too high in this area and nothing on the horizon to bring them down to where they should be.
Scott Miller
11:05 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Don't ya just wish they could've negotiated or the public could've learned more.
Lots of options I keep thinking of, some might be horrible, some might not be doable however who's to say that a John Deere, Casey's, Tone's Spice or Toro wasn't just waiting in the wind for the right to name the complex, a building or an area?
And from what I heard from the Town Hall Meeting, I truly wish that one of the school board members and her friends main concern hadn't been roads, what the plan was for the bridges and if 36th street would really take traffic off 1st street. That's a city problem, yet that's what one board member was concerned about. I didn't even know how to respond to that when I was told that.
Peter Brady
6:28 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
My gosh. Finally. let move on to the current needs instead of this circus.
Scott Miller
11:01 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
which are? Peter you seem to make a lot of comments with very little detail or substance to back them up. William does a great job at making a point with substance. Kurt and Joe have asked questions, given opinions but with reasoning however I feel that you just throw out random statements.
Heck even Megan has asked you to explain your comments a few times and you don't respond.
Jim Zupan
10:37 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
I got to agree. William and Joe, both against this, both came up with sound arguements, backed by reasonbly correct facts. I would love to have coffee with either, as i think I would enjoy their conversation. My hat's off to the both of them
Joe Dygas
6:38 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Well, I guess that settled the issue. Now all the bloggers can take a much need vacation as I have. regards to all friend or foe.
Scott Miller
11:12 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Joe it's been real!
The problem is the issue isn't settled :) This project may be dead but the stadium is still 40 years old, the visitor side still doesn't have seating, modern restrooms and the concession stand is still, well a health hazard waiting to happen. Parking is still inadequate and next year there will be at least twice as many home games. The school district's only pool option is still a 2nd floor, 8 lane pool inside a member paying dues YMCA that doesn't meet code and thus doesn't allowing for diving.
We'll see what the school board does to solve that problem. Unless I'm missing something the only solution now is to bond. Sweet, more taxes!
Charlotte G.
2:00 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Scott, the concession stand comment, well. Please, explain. If it is a "well a health hazard waiting to happen", well, why do you say that? Please explain, since the health of our kids is at stake, not to mention the parents, etc., who eat things from that concession stand. If this was such a concern, well, tell us. If so, it should've been shut down years ago. How did this concession stand get around the regulators, since the food served their is so dangerous to our health?
Jessica Henderson
11:29 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Charlotte have you been to football or soccer game, track meet lately (ie last 10 years)? If yes, then no explanation is needed.
Charlotte G.
12:10 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012
Yes, Jessica, I've been to many games at that stadium in the last 10 yrs. or so. By my saying "yes"- I don't see why no explanation is needed, as you say. Conditions are not that deplorable. We've heard for years how this stadium does not compare to others in the metro. For me, this stadium just well, retained it's small-town roots, warts and all. Yes, it can be improved, and it can be totally replaced, as we have so often been told as the best path forward. Now, back to that inadequate venue, it seems we are stuck with.
Charlotte G.
12:39 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012
Wendt, at one point, finally gave into sports interests here, in proposing a new 10,000- seat football stadium to that school board, then. Remember that, anyone? I remember being shocked back then with this audacious 10,000 figure. With the split to 2 HS, why would it ever be expected fans would fill 10,000 seats, except when the 2 hs here played each other? We are not, nor ever have been Valley. They choose long ago not to split, because of their sports legacy not being secure in the future, if they had split. Now, we well know the results of their path, with valley stadium being so, well, you know. I'm sure we don't have to worry about their concession stands being a health hazard.
Charlotte G.
1:11 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012
Sorry to say, but seeing that 10,000 seat figure again was strike one for me with this new solution. Wendt, well, he was trying too hard, and he did not truly vet that figure. Why this number was ever proposed again? I can see the dreamers seeing filling all those seats, but only in their dreams. Focusing on the stadium capacity in these plans, not fair maybe in the overall plans. But, just see that many of us here didn't want to get invested in another grand plan. We saw how PT played out, not meeting overall expectations so far. But, at least in PT now, we have the results of our schools there being built. The only good thing, imo, with this development fully supported, officially, with schools and city, going forward. They, schools and city took that risk, with mediocre results. Very hard to support this latest proposal, with too many risks involved.
Charlotte G.
1:25 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012
Sorry, Joe, in blogging too long. My advice, in intentionally doing so, is this: Support our athletic activities here moving on, with all the uncertainty-especially in the next 2 years. Show up at games, pay that admission fee, and don't be afraid to eat anything served, if you choose to eat and drink. I doubt you will get sick, let alone die. And, oh, remember this...Many booster clubs support those concessions, not just those only, well, truly sports-related. I think.
William
11:39 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
@Scott Miller, sorry for the confusion, but I have not and am not suggesting that private investors build a municipal (aka; public) stadium, swimming pool or anything else that they wouldn't own.
I am asking why private investors haven't lined up trying to get a piece of this project so that they can profit handsomely by tapping the apparently huge pent up demand for this type of facility. If a sports complex is what everyone in Ankeny needs and wants, I'm sure private investors would have no trouble renting out the stadium for events, charging admission/membership to those poor souls who can't find a lane to swim in at the Y, charging the AAU, club and all other youth sports a fee to practice on their fields, etc., etc., etc. If what Scott Koch claims is true, there are events lined up just waiting to book this facility. Why would a private investor not want a piece of that profit?
I keep hearing that taxes wouldn't go up if the school district agreed to the $2 million/20 year plan. That's plain wrong. If the school district bonds to build a new stadium or pool, or if the school district would have agreed to make a $2 million dollar payment for 20 years, the money has to come from somewhere -- and that somewhere is taxes.
Taxes go up when bonding/borrowing and taxes go up when the annual budget is INCREASED by $2 million dollars every year.
Scott Koch
10:21 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
William, I think all everyone had hoped was that there were open discussions and more importantly negotiations that could occur. Did anyone contact Topeka for example & at least ask questions? Couldn't hurt right? Listen, as a former WDM resident who moved to Ankeny, I don't like my taxes any better than the next person nor do I want them to increase!
Maybe taxes would go up at 2 and 20, but would they have to at a different level? I don't know that answer but neither do any of the rest of us.
The other item not factored in is extra revenue: the booster club could make more money, the school district could make more money through ticket revenue both with a larger stadium & facilities that can host more events. The city could program more: swimming lessons, lifeguard classes, aerobic classes, expanding the triathlon, volleyball and basketball leagues, year-round usage, hosting their own events or leagues. In addition by actually owning facilities, which they currently do not (can't think of any....) they would now have rental opportunities for home & garden show, healthy welness expo, new year's eve event, winter Ankeny Fest, winter movie night.
And ya know what, maybe this is good for Ankeny. Maybe people will look at the stadium differently, say we need something better, safer but then learn about the price tag. Sometimes it takes touching the boiling pan on the stove to learn it's hot.
Jessica Henderson
11:36 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
William, it seems like you work for the city or school district as you mention they can't possbly have enough funds to come up with "x" dollars or that taxes would have to be raised (That's plain wrong). Since you have such inside knowledge that most of us obviously don't, I agree with Scott Miller in that would you please inform us posters why this was never brought to a vote, why the public wasn't allowing to hear more from their perspectives or their thought process and who at their level actually said we aren't moving forward.
My concern is now they have to bond verse before there were at least options.
I also learned that because a basketball tournament got cancelled in Ankeny, that some actitivies teams that were going to work it and use it as a fund raiser now can't, thus money that would NOT have had to come out of the school district budget will now have to.
A small drip in the bucket I know, but still a drip.
Scott Koch
10:09 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Just a few events that currently aren't able to occur in Ankeny, possibly even in Greater Des Moines, can't expand or have occured and left because of inadequate facilities. Please keep in-mind that these would either directly effect the Booster Club or bring visitors to town to spend money in the community, taxes and revenue that would never be here otherwise. And for those that aren't aware, Fligg Fieldhouse is not air-conditioned. Northview's main gyms are not air-conditioned.
- Hosting CIML meets for all grade levels
- Ankeny Soccer Club, Junior Football programs, Basketball and Volleyball programs
- NCAA, NAIA, National Junior College
- Iowa Conference, Midwest Collegiate Conference, Iowa Community College Athletic Conference
- State, regional, National events for each
1. Various USA Gymnastics, Judo, Swimming, Track & Field, Water Polo, Wrestling, etc events
2. Various AAU events
3. Various USSSA events
- Basketball and Volleyball
- Area soccer tournaments – indoor and outdoor
- Locally created events through the city
- Locally created events through the booster club
- Flag Football events
- Ultimate Frisbee events
- Triathlon training
- And 100s of other groups not mentioned above
- Rental by everyone as we live in a cold weather climate
Mark Kramme
2:09 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Thank you to all the bloggers, both for and against this project. Your elected officials just gave you a preview of your children's future Sports Activities and Opportunities in Ankeny. There are 3000 kids in Club Soccer, 2500 kids in Junior Football, 900 in Basketball, 600 in Girls Volleyball, 350 in Swimming, there are at least 30,000 family members and students in Ankeny that are directly or indirectly impacted by Ankeny Sports! Where were these family's and Students Sunday? As long as the majority in Ankeny let the small elected minority make the decisions that affect your children's and the towns future economic needs, you get what you Voted For! Do lower taxes yield a higher Quality of Life in Ankeny? Hell No! 500 acres of "Something to do in Ankeny" is what your elected officials said No too. There was no vote by City Council or The School Board. Who made the decision, the outgoing Mayor, Kessinger, Tracy, Cahill , and Shaffer? Of this little group, who has children in Ankeny Schools today? I guess Open Meeting rules don't apply to our elected officials? Maybe this is speculation on my part, but who's to know, who made the decision for the other 49,990 residents of Ankeny. Where were the Open Meetings for the Public to voice their opinions? Maybe they made the decision based on the attendance at the Open Forum last Sunday?
Megan VerHelst
2:40 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
That's a very valid question, Mark, and I'm looking into it. I'd be curious to know as well because that was the biggest question I had after reading the press release.
Mark Kramme
2:54 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Another miss quote, 45 million to fix a 30 year old Federal Interstate Bridge overpass at 1st street, Ankeny is only responsible for 7% of this cost. How much money has Ankeny spent running utilities out to every corner of Prairie Trail in hopes of residential development that has never come? Now were going ahead with building a new Uptown Downtown for Ankeny residents to congregate, visit, or visit another chain restaurant. I feel bad for all the money that DRA Properties has spent on Prairie Trail. Most new residents of Ankeny move here because of our Schools and our School Athletic Programs, and our Club Sports Programs, not because were building a new uptown.
Last, but not least, I have heard from a few City and School insiders that this project was declined because of my brother's credibility? My brother is a part of the 99% in Ankeny who are fighting to stay a float, day by day. How do you define a credible person? Is it their name, the size of their wallet, is it who you know, an elected official??? Creditability is earned! Ankeny was built on the backs of guys like my brother. A Guy who dared to speak out against the establishment and propose a different future for Ankeny Sports enthusiast. He spent his last nickle on this project because he believed in Ankeny's future. Ankeny's political establishment has proven once again that unless you have the name and the money you won't get the votes!
Scott Koch
2:49 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Dr. John Crompton
Distinguished Professor Texas A&M
Former Councilman in College Station, TX
http://www.johncrompton.com/background/pugsley%20Medal%20Citation.htm
John came and spoke May 6th, 2012 in downtown Des Moines.
In the 1990s, Crompton initiated a research program aimed at identifying the extent to which park and recreation services conferred "public" benefits on communities. These are benefits that accrue to a preponderance of residents in a community even though they do not use any of the services or facilities offered by park and recreation agencies. This is a central policy issue, since the assumption of such community-wide benefits provides much of the justification for the tax subsidies that fund most agencies.
Interesting point because although it's talking about parks or the city side of things, it directly relates to the school district also and the point that just because you don't use something doesn't mean you don't indirectly benefit.
Matt Lydon
3:05 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Mark, you tried to push through something that no one asked for. None of those elected officials you named campaigned on building a sports mega-plex and yet you expect them to carry your water. Let's be honest, you showed up one day with a grandiose idea that was splashed across the front page of the Register, but was not high on the list of anyone's priorities and they told you they weren't interested after some consideration. Do you really think lashing out at them on a blog post is going to help you get what you want? Projects like this take time and require an incredible amount of community support and elected officials that are fully behind it. Just because this wasn't going to happen this year, doesn't mean it couldn't get done in the future, but because of the way you decided to conduct yourself, you probably won't be apart of the conversation.
Mark Kramme
3:23 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Matt, Ankeny Sports facilities are on Life Support! We did exactly what we were told to do by both City Staff and the Ankeny School Staff in preparing this comprehensive Plan. All we asked for is that this Plan would be released to the Public and that the General Public would be a part of the discussion. So much for Open Meetings? Who decided that this wasn't in the best interest of the Tax Payers? We all deserve to know when and where this Vote on behalf of the Tax Payers to not support or discuss this Project in Ankeny took place? Who Voted? There were 49,990 other residents that weren't apart of the conversation, Why?
Evil Genius Villain
4:20 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Mark-
You speak with forked tongue (and bad spelling.) You stated that all you wanted to do was to have the public institutions release your plan when many bloggers here kept asking you to release it and you never did. When you finally did submit something it was an unfinished 7th grade Powerpoint presentation. No substance and no plan of finance. If you paid $75k for this then you got took. Where is the real plan?
I would love to see your vision come to Ankeny. I agree there is a need for it. I know the kids would love it. However I don't think a facility like this would make money and I don't think the taxpayers of Ankeny should be funding this. I would suggest taking your plan to private capital equity players and/or some hedge fund managers. See if they bite?
William
3:43 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Mark, who exactly from the city and the school district "told" you what to do regarding your proposal? Name names. Was this an official request made by the entire school board and did it appear in the school board meeting minutes? I regularly attend school board meetings, read all the agendas and meeting minutes, and can't say that I ever saw any mention of this proposal until it appeared on the public comments portion of the agenda the last couple of meetings.
Did you get the request in writing from the city and who made the request? Where does it appear in the city council meeting minutes?
If this wasn't an official request for proposal, and I'm fairly certain it wasn't, then I don't believe you've got any reason to complain about the process and being turned down by the city and the school district.
Neither entity officially requested your proposal and they weren't interested in it. Crying foul now is just a bad case of sour grapes.
William
4:00 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
@Jessica, sorry, good guess, but I don't work for the city or the school district. I do however, pay close attention to both entities, attend school board and city council meetings, keep up to date on meeting agenda items, and read all city council and school board meeting minutes. I also vote in city and school board elections. That doesn't give me any "inside information" as you put it.
The school district budget problems, along with problems associated with allowable growth and mid year state across the board cuts to school funding have been well publicized. The district budget information is published and updated regularly with reports to the board (and can also be found on the website) and it takes very little time to read and understand that information.
It's no secret that city of Ankeny is struggling to make their budget stretch. In fact, recent articles clearly say the city is currently trying to fix a budget gap and avoid another tax increase. That tells me the city of Ankeny doesn't have an extra $2 million dollars for 20 years to sink into a sports complex at this time. No inside information is necessary to figure that out.
It's the same with the Ankeny School Board. The school budget is tighter than ever and limited monies are being stretched as far as possible in order to open and pay for new schools, teachers, and equipment. The district isn't flush with money and doesn't have an extra $40 million laying around to devote to sports.
Jessica Henderson
4:52 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Thanks William. I'll dig a little deeper and take a look. I appreciate the response and although I too have heard the same budget talks, cuts, deficits, etc there is always room for adjustment; or at least looking more closely.
Matt Lydon
4:12 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Mark, you are beating a dead horse. Ideas and proposals are discussed among board members and city councilors all the time that lack support and therefore don't make an agenda for a meeting. Also, you want $78.3 million to build an athletic park, but can't go a sentence without using improper grammar and capitalizing words that shouldn't be capitalized? That doesn't instill confidence and reinforces my belief that the money is better spent on education, not athletics.
Mark Kramme
4:27 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Matt, "city councilors" is this a new elected official that we don't know about? For your education, I think you meant City Staff?
Jessica Henderson
10:38 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Really Matt? ".....but can't go a sentence without using improper grammar and capitalizing words that shouldn't be capitalized? That doesn't instill confidence....". Really?
This is a post on a blog on a website that doesn't have spell check.
Mark Kramme, along with others below ask a great question - why the behind the scenes, under the table, secretive meetings?
Matt Lydon
4:34 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Keep it classy, Mark.
Mark Kramme
4:36 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Ditto
William
4:36 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Mark, councilors is correct. It simply means a member of a council and can be spelled with one "l" or two; whichever you prefer. See below.
coun·cil·lor (kouns-lr, -slr)
n.
Variant of councilor.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
councillor US, councilor [ˈkaʊnsələ]
n
(Government, Politics & Diplomacy) a member of a council
councillorship US, councilorship n
Jessica Henderson
4:53 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
William I think you have too much time on your hands! LOL
Jim Zupan
6:00 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
I think Mark's question is valid. What matt says is true -"Ideas and proposals are discussed among board members and city councilors all the time that lack support and therefore don't make an agenda for a meeting." But how often do they release a joint statement when it's not on a agenda. i will be looking into this. I don't care what side your on, you can;t want a local government to be using back room politics. I would have been more comfortable had there been a vote. How does the city council, or the school board say no to something that has never been officially on an agenda? I smell something here.
Sorry about any grammar, or spelling issues…blame my spell checker
Jack F
6:23 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Once again our elected officials deliberate together out of the public eye and make decisions without being in the open. Didn't like the old board because they spent toooo much, but the reign of this board and their "wink, wink" everyone agrees with us because we won an election so we can just do what we want without input from the people who elected us needs to stop. This plus $176,000 closed door deal is just evidence of their arrogence.
Jessica Henderson
10:26 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
What I would like to know is IF all elected officials and IF all school board members were a part of this decision or if it was in fact made by only a few.
I believe we should all know if there was a poll and what that was. If council took a pool was it 6-0, 5-1, was it just the mayor making this decision and if everyone voted, who voted which direction. Regardless of the vote, I think it should go to the public for debate, I think we should hear council is for or against and if the vote were to be close I definately think there should be a public discussion.
Same for the board. Did Mr. Tracy push this through, Mr. Shafer? I'm not sure who was at the town hall meeting other than Mr. Shafer and Mrs. Cahill but what was that vote, if there was a vote. And let's assume a concensus was made, was that 4-3?
The public deserves more than this and I hope the Patch, the Register, Channels 5, 8 and 13 and most importantly Ankeny residents at least ask questions verse just continuing with back door, small town, hand shake politics!!!
Peter Brady
9:13 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
I love this! True colors coming though. Ok Kramme its time to take your ball and go home. This dog wont hunt. etc. its over and done.
Jessica Henderson
10:15 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Yeah Peter, good post! Nice personal attack, good job! Way to add something to this dialogue!
Jessica Henderson
10:51 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
2 questions
- What does it hurt if the council or board (or both) discussed this in public? We keep hearing "Find private investment". Maybe if one or both supported movement of the project some might come forward if they saw buildings might actually be built.
- What does it hurt if it were brought to a public referendum? After negotiations, talks, debates and hopefully MORE LEARNING, maybe the numbers could be decreased and maybe the vote to the public might be less than it's currently talked about. Maybe more time in open, honest, non personal feelings and legitimate discussions would do everyone some good.
And if in the end the public says no way, not now then so be it. But I don't like where we are now, not from the school board (4 new members, superintendent, CFO and curriculum director along with others gone) nor the city council (with a mayor who's leaving, a city manager who's retired, a councilmember who's already left and spot left to be filled).
Matt Lydon
11:06 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Capitalizing nouns at random has nothing to do with spell check, it has to do with a complete disregard for proper grammar. Don't you think there should be some sort of standard of those who are wanting to be entrusted with nearly $80 million of the communities money? I understand the occasional error, but it showed a complete lack of professional writing abilities and that gross lack of detail reflects poorly. No one wanted to touch this project with a ten foot pole and that is why you don't hear one elected official coming out in support of this proposal. Furthermore, none of the candidates running for the city council special election have voiced support for this idea and I find that to be a great gauge of the current sentiment of the community. If they thought it was popular, it would be part of their platform, but it's not, so it isn't.
Elizabeth
12:43 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012
Matt said in his 6/27 11:06 pm posting, "Don't you think there should be some sort of standard of those who are wanting to be entrusted with nearly $80 million of the communities money?"
Shouldn't you use the possessive form "community's money" instead of the plural form "communities money?"
Sure glad YOU aren't asking for $80 million of MY money!! Actually, I'm just giving you a hard time :)) But it is kind of funny!
Matt Lydon
12:34 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
haha. I'm busted. I guess no $80 million for me? Can we settle on $40 million? :)
Scott Koch
1:31 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
To make sure we all understand the project clearly and factually, Elizabeth and Matt, who do you think will actually own this $78.3 million complex? Who do you think will have 1st and 2nd rights for programming?
Joe Morr
10:41 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012
This dog won't hunt. It's dead on arrival. The city and school should be doing everything they can to lower our property taxes. The people living in Ankeny are not all rich people. Ask the coaches in Ankeny what they really want. They should be able to speak up now. In the 40's and 50's we lived on what we had and didn't have to keep up with the Jones's. We can never be small as we once were but we do not have to get to big for our pants either. Joe Morr
Scott Koch
2:42 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
Joe, please explain your first statement further. I was at the town hall meeting and may have missed you there but how aware are you of the details of the project?
Secondly I too want my property taxes lower, but I also want more commerical in-town and more tax revenue flowing into my town also.
It is interesting that a city not too far from here is building a Sports Park and their 4 Main Pillars are: Places for Youth to Play, Community Involvement, Safety & Accessiblity and Economic Vitality.
Lastly, I believe we should all want what's best for our children & future generations. My parents were never rich & aren't now but they managed to find a way to get by and provide my brothers & I will the best. Keeping up with the Jones and providing a quality product can be two different items. One can try to "keep up with the Jones" and built larger, bigger, more bright. Providing a quality product can mean not having a 40 year old stadium, a swimming pool with only 8 lanes and on a 2nd floor, air conditioned basketball/volleyball courts & more fields so 9 years aren't getting home at 9pm.
We can continue to debate & dicuss all we want but this project wasn't building anything others communities don't have in some fashion. But we also have to remember, Ankeny isn't like other communities & our growing, active, avg age 34 year population sure isn't either.
Joe we look forward to your insight and thoughts, you've probably forgotten more knowledge than I've learned.
Martha J.
4:41 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Joe, if that is true then ask the board why they voted to spend all that money to pay off Wendt? Why did they spend $4M to upgrade our athletic fields while at the same time asking for a bond to build classrooms? Why did they approve the largest staffing plan in the history of our school district? This board is crazy and has shown NO restraint to curb spending or reduce our taxes. They all lied to get into power and the new gang has turned out MUCH worse than the Fab 4.
Keep them accountable Joe! You need to be fair watch Ankeny's back with this new board!
Martha J.
4:44 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Joe, Tracy, Cahill, Shafer and the new gang of board members are using you. You have always been a crusader for Ankeny and now these terrible politicians are laughing at you behind your back while you do all of their dirty work! Ask them at the next board meeting, WHY AREN'T YOU CUTTING SPENDING LIKE YOU PROMISED!!!! Don't vote for the bond Joe and don't help them pass it either. We don't need more buildings and taxes.
William
4:23 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
@Scott Koch, I'm not Elizabeth or Matt, but I think you're grasping at straws here. The city of Ankeny, the Ankeny School District, and those of us opposed to using tax dollars to build a mega sports complex aren't against the project because of a lack of understanding about who would have (past tense :) owned the darn thing.
Like the press release said, the city and school declined to be involved because the project is not a wise use of tax dollars. I keep asking why private investors don't just step in and build it, but have yet to get a coherent answer. Is it only a good idea if tax money is used? Instead of beating up on the city and school district, why aren't you (general you) out raising money to build it without tax money?
Scott Koch
4:37 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
You mean other than because they are/would be municipal buildings?
Scott Koch
4:35 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
3 other revenue streams to consider:
- http://thegazette.com/2012/03/21/committee-approves-field-of-dreams-sales-tax-rebate/
- thus let's assume this complex, through mostly merchandise, tickets & concessions can make $98,000/year
- and this would be without ANY commerical development
- now let's look at a $1 "surcharge" on ticket prices. Yes, yes, yes I know, you're increasing the cost of us to go to games. Well about 1/3 of the school district fans will be from out of town, pretty sure P&R doesn't program ticketed events & about 80% of the 3rd user, the "clubs" are from out of town. Plus when was the last time ticket prices increased? I don't know the answer, help?
- so just for football, at $1 * 6,000 fans (conservative) * 9 home games (this would be without either team making the playoffs) you have $54,000 annually just from football
- 3rd opportunity is the complex has a fitness center component. I'm sure we all know that WDM & Clive have 70,000sf Prairie Life Fitness, Aspen, 7-Flags, Fitness World West, Walnut Creek YMCA. Waukee has a 70,000-ish sf YMCA & Urbandale has an Aspen Athletic Club also. Thus I think there is a lot of potential in Ankeny for another fitness center.
- as a member of the YMCA I pay $53/month. Let's assume this fitness center can get 3,000 members. Which if the YMCA has 5,000 that's still only 16% of the community. So 3,000 * $53/mo * 12 = $1.908/year
Lots of opportunities, let's just make sure we're looking at everything.
William
4:46 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
No, Scott. If a private investor builds a sports complex, the private investor owns it. (I'm resisting the urge to type a really big DUH! here :) No one expects a private entity to just hand over a building (resisting....resisting....resisting....) to the city or school district.
I'm wondering why private investors, like the Kramme brothers and you, perhaps, aren't investing their own money and building this thing -- then reaping all the benefits and profits you keep talking about. If it's good for the school and city, isn't it good for private investors too?
Elizabeth
4:48 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
You have a great sense of humor, Matt!! Since you did fairly well with the rest of your grammar skills, I'll send you that check for $40M asap. I'll just tap into my extra Cayman account :)) How soon can you get the sports complex completed?? There will be a bonus if it's done by fall 2013!
All joking aside, we still have a problem that's not going away as our community continues to grow. The school district (and/or city) must bond for additional sports facilities whether they build new ones or renovate old ones. This will certainly increase property taxes and provide absolutely NO significant revenue stream to offset the increase.
Bloggers have suggested getting private investors. What venture capitalist will jump into an investment with a 5-year breakeven point and a $80 M price tag with no guarantees or personal benefits? Other successful sports complexes across the US seem to be community-based projects rather than private ventures. It only works because the community has chosen to support the project and use the facilities to their fullest potential. Does anyone believe Ankeny currently has the visionaries on the City Council or School Board to make this project a reality regardless of who the land developer or management firm might be?
Jack F
6:01 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Elizabeth- the city and school had a closed door meeting out of the public eye and decided that the Ankeny community does not want this. It is a DEAD horse. Why do you guys keep kicking it. King George finally saved us some money. Let it go.....
Matt Lydon
5:23 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
I appreciate the contribution. Keep $1 million for yourself, for your effort.
Indianola just finished a plan to build a new recreation center that brought in funds from the school district, city, Simpson College, private investors, and community contributions. I don't think anyone expects it to be completely paid for with private monies, but I think they want to see a concerted effort to lower the cost. Public-private ventures are more common than not now and it brings more stakeholders on board and promises a higher likelihood of success. I played little league on the baseball fields when they were at DMACC and they were crappy, but I had the time of my life, so it is hard to buy that somehow all of the great additions that have been made since then are woefully inadequate. I'm all for a new football stadium, swimming pools, etc, but they need to be done in a way that make financial sense and can generate revenue from the community. It has been done elsewhere and I have confidence that it can be done here, but because it isn't a core function of either the school district or city, it has to be done in a manner that makes sense and I just don't feel like we are there with what was proposed. The conversation has certainly been started and I look forward to see where it goes.
Elizabeth
5:41 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
Partnerships seem to be the only way to afford these large-scale projects. Is DMACC interested or any other entities in the area?
Elizabeth
5:24 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
In Aug. 2011, Dr. Hansel (CFO of our school district) stated that for every $5M bonded, taxes would increase at a rate of $.08/$1,000.
Using these figures, an $80M bond would run and extra $16 per mo. for a $150,000 home. (Calculation: $80M / $5M * $.08 / $1,000 x $150,000 / 12 mos.= $16). If you built a $40M complex, then only $8 per month.
Has the city or school determined if you can bond for a lease payment or must it be paid only from operating funds? William -- since you are "in the know" and seem to be well-informed on school & municipal funding, is this an option? They had discussed $2.1 M each from the school and city.
If we could bond for only $5M each year, then the cost is $ 1 / mo. for a $150,000 home. (Calculation: For $5M bonded: $.08 / $1,000 * $150,000 / 12 mos. = $1).
William
6:43 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
Good question, Elizabeth. I'm no school finance expert and don't claim to be. I probably know just enough to be dangerous, but I do know that in general, school districts are not allowed to issue bonds in order to make annual lease payments. State statue allows school districts to enter into lease purchase arrangements, but those payments must come from the general operating budget. It's true that schools can issue bonds in order to acquire property - but in a lease purchase arrangement, the property doesn't actually belong to the district until the final lease payment is made.
With school and city budgets as tight as they've ever been, I don't see where either can come up with an annual $2 million dollar payment from current budgets without making severe cuts elsewhere. Heck, the annual city parks & recreation budget isn't anywhere near $2 million.
Joe Morr
2:11 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
After visiting an old 60'S navy buddy in Indiana, I'm back and ready to comment on some of your comments you sent Patch. The expense for the redoing of fields is something they had to do as the seeding did not do well but I believe at a board meeting they are going to try and get it back from the contractors. Please don't get me started on the FAB 4 (They were spenders from the start and listened to no one). I do believe this board does listen and will save us money in the long run. You have all read in the paper about the board trying to get the money back from Matt Wendt and I believe we'll succeed. Matt called me to have a meeting with him before he left but I told him after he read by last two e-mails he might not like to meet with me. Well, he's off to Oswego and I missed our last meeting somehow! At the present time I do not believe the bond issue will pass in February. If the board would let the new high school be 9th and 10th graders and leave the present high school for 11th and 12th graders I believe a lot of problems would be solved. Our new superintendent Bruce has filled a lot of open slots, hired new personnel, and I think, when the smoke clears, we will be more than ready for a new year. Yes, I may be an old timer but common sense distates where I'll stand and who I'll stand behind. Honesty has always been my taught policy and I'll not change for anyone. To many people who know me wouldn't want me to be any other way.
Ruth F.
4:25 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
How do you explain the board paying $180,000 in severance they did not need to? How do you explain over $4,000,000 in athletic field improvements while asking for a bond for more classrooms? How do you explain the new board only lowering taxes the same amount the old board approved? Joe, something is not right and we need you to help protect us, our homes, and our money. Please check into all of this and make it right.
Jack F
8:17 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
I'm close to retirement. Since joe is running this new board I would like to know what the answer to Ruth is. Btw it was over 5 mill and they still didn't finish the dug outs or seating. It had nothing to do with grass or the contractor joe.. Honesty is what you said... I don't think you are the guy that has been writing letters to the dm rag... These posts are too slick...
Joe Morr
12:57 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Jack F. and Martha J. - It was the contractor who did not complete the contract for the baseball field. The board could sue to get the money back if not completed by the contract language.. I am the person writing the letters to the editor, with my own words and yes, honesty is what you will get from me. If you read the paper the school board is going to make Matt Wendt sue to get the money he thinks he's getting by not telling the board he already had a job in Illinois. He led them to believe he might not even go into education and he told me by phone, he had been working on this since April. The reason he probably did not get along with the present board is he became the tail of the dog not the head like he was with the old one. He pushed his agenda, including two high schools, and when I disagreed with him I was an advisary to him. I have had many meetings with him and at first I thought he was the answer to our problems but after the two school agenda he dropped me like a hot potato. He used me and I used him in finding out where he was going so the meetings benefited both of us. I did, in a letter to the editor, ask him to give the $176,000 back to my three great grandchildren who attend Ankeny Schools and I truly believe he'll never see a penny of the contract he hoodwinked the board in giving him. The only question I wish the lawyer had asked is, "Do you have a NEW job"? If he answered yes, I would not have paid him a cent.
Connor
3:13 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Joe, let's wait and see. If the board knew he was looking for a job or helped him in any way to secure a new job, then they are to blame. I agree the attorney should have asked him the question you state, but so should have every board member. They are in WAY over their head or they had such despise for him and his team that they couldn't help to pay him off. Now they are wearing very high boots and trying to clean up their mess!
Jack F
4:23 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
So Joe- if it was such a big deal that he not work for a year, why didn't King George and stay too long Pat.... Pres and VP- leaders... Just put one sentence in the offer???? Looks like they had closed sessions away from public eye to set their employee up... I never read that they are just going to sit and not pay the agreement???? "make him sue" for what they signed???? Where did you hear that? King tell you at coffee? If the politicians were honest they would lick their wounds, apologize to us taxpayers for agreeing to pay $176,000 for ANY reason and honor their signature on the contract. Heck the city handed out half a million and I haven't heard on complaint out of save our taxes Joe. I guess you only care about taxes if it messes with your private seating???
Troy Murphy
5:21 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Joe what you are telling us then is that this school board and attorney are not competent to negotiate a contract. That if they do negotiate a contract and it embarrasses them they won't pay and will force the person with the contract to sue. You are also telling us at the same time that said board members won't enforce the contract for the baseball field but would rather just pay someone to have it done or was it because they never bothered to read that contract and the dugouts weren't included?. My guess is that the contract for the sports complex etc was negotiated as competently as the contract for Dr. Wendt, which is to say not at all. From the accounts I have read they had been told he was looking for another job. I am curious to know what Jack is talking about private seating. Can a person pay to have a reserved seat at sporting events in Ankeny? If so it would be a great way to generate more revenue to help Ankeny defray some of the excessive cost of the sports complex
Joe Morr
3:52 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Connor - I do not believe the board or lawyer knew anything about him looking for a job or having one. The reason of their dislike for him might have been the way he ran the previous board and he knew this could not be done with this current board. I believe the new superintendent will take care of everything and I look forward in helping him in any way I can. I know him to be a just man and one I can trust. I'm very happy to see Pat setting in motion the plan to see how much Matt Wendt wants to take the Ankeny School Disttrict to court. Let's wait and see what happens in the next month or so before we make judgements on this board. As long as the kids in Ankeny get a good education by good teachers, including my great grandchildren, I'll be happy as a lark. Now let's see if we can get two or three new members to serve on the city council. Let's cut down on spending on both entities and live within their check book.
Jack F
4:32 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Give this new board a chance.. They campaigned on change and blew over 5 million opening day. A million dollar garage to store their cars in the winter. Come on, let's be objective Joe.. I have read letters years ago where you loved the old Dr. And now hate him. I assume the same will happen to our new super. He better be careful and keep people at arms length. We in Ankeny like to chew off our civil servants arms while we let the "good ol boys (and Pat)" politicians do whatever they want. Look at the city and Block. He voted one time not to tax and he is your buddy for it. He voted to gift a half a million and raise taxes for years. I do not follow that logic. I read where you attack all these others and give a select few a pass. Hypocritical in my book. But you are using your full name so I guess you are ok.
Troy Murphy
5:26 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
I haven't heard about the garage could somebody tell me what exactly a million dollar garage was built for? I thought the bussing in Ankeny was contracted by an outside company, what does Ankeny need a million dollar garage for? Seriously? I thought they were dumb for the 176k. What the heck do we need a garage for, your pulling my leg aren't you?
Troy Murphy
1:03 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Ok, I am asking Charlotte, Joe, anyone what special seat? What am I not getting that obviously everyone else seems to understand without saying it? And why is it referred to without coming out and saying it? What special seat obviously it must be a bone of contention in Ankeny. Sorry but I don't follow sports (everyone can gasp now and shake their heads in abject horror) so obviously something has happened that is "common" knowledge that is not really "common" knowledge. Would anyone care to explain or is it a we can't discuss this in polite company, ie publicly, type thing?
No one has answered my previous post about a million dollar garage? Is this for real? Is the school building a million dollar building just to house school vehicles? They really wouldn't do that when they need money to finish the sports stuff would they? I can't seem to find anything online about this and I have tried looking at the board minutes. Can anyone point me in the right direction or which board meeting this was done?
Charlotte G.
2:53 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
For me here, always hard to take how Joe was attacked, in his obvious views. How could anyone of us expect there not to be a "Joe" here? If we grew up in smaller towns, well, there was always some version of "Joe". His voice would've been lost in cities, if we grew up in such cities, with their many, many voices chiming in. Balancing, the key. Never found here.
Charlotte G.
3:08 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Balancing. With Joe continued to be attacked? The cruelness here lately made me again ??, why? I didn't ever totally buy into Joe's version of this town. It was clear his main focus-sports. Well, if my kids did not excel sports-wise here, back then..What back-up plan was in place here? Oh, so many other activities, but clear that the only clear view here, was sports, with so many $$ signs in various eyes. After sports, nothing else mattered much here.
Charlotte G.
3:27 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
I would ask Joe, if he ever quietly attended any activity of his kids, his grands, not to mention his greats, not sport-related here. Always nice to sit back, for we parents in a non-sports activity, to NOT hear that frenzy of voices of others, but just to sit back. Listen. Appreciate. And, appreciate other options, if our kids, for some reason, do not aspire to be a stellar athlete. I know, very hard to take. But, I find much value in supporting other activities, after getting over that initial disappointment with sports, when sitting on the bench took a sad meaning here.
Charlotte G.
4:30 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Troy, that million $$ garage? Not easy to take, but..if no one has answered your question on this until now, well? It seems this expenditure may have had to be faced by any board now. Whether this is needed now? It seems our new board was left clueless in trying to deal with issues such as this. With all those $$ now spent left and right, right? Not an easy transition, schools and city-board-wise. Too bad they all could not have given up their various egos, in trying to serve us here, whatever our interests.
Jack F
9:09 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Then and now all the new tax and spend politicians needed to do was stop spending for the first year and see where they are. Catch up before funning to the pubic trough to spend. I am sure the garage could have waited one winter and it is obvious that the ball fields can. I think our baseball and softball are doing great on that nasty old field that didn't cost millions to build because they were already there.
William
11:21 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Troy, information about the garage (storage building) folks are referring to can be found here;
http://facilities--construction.ankeny.schoolfusion.us/modules/locker/files/get_group_file.phtml?gid=718386&fid=13182383&sessionid=b6a6abe64a300edb966a33c0e8a931e0
It's probably just me, but I have real difficulty understanding most of Charlotte's posts. The Joe Morr seat she and others are referring to was a long standing and unwritten "tradition" that Mr. Morr had a certain special seat reserved just for him at all home sporting events. For some odd reason, Mr. Morr's longevity in the community afforded him, and no others, this special honor. As new superintendents came and went and the school board began to focus on things other than sports, Joe's special seat ( and thus his "special standing" within the sports community) was quietly done away with.
As I understand it, Mr. Morr and his cronies were quite upset and resentful about this perceived loss of personal status and as each superintendent (Dr. Mutchler and then Dr. Wendt) tired of Mr. Morr's constant complaints and objections to pretty much everything the school board did or didn't do, he and his friends turned on them. It happened with Dr. Mutchler and as we've seen in Joe's letters and posts here recently, it happened again with Dr. Wendt.
Elizabeth
5:35 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012
William, I also share your difficulty in interpreting Charlotte's posts. It's as if they are written in a special code, and I just haven't broken it yet. (No disrespect intended, K?)
Megan VerHelst
11:28 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
I just deleted several comments that had nothing to do with the topic at hand here. While I love the passionate discussion that occurs, let's try to channel it back into the topic of the sports complex, not about the people leaving comments here.
Jim Zupan
10:55 am on Monday, July 9, 2012
I think you have more work to do Megan...either that, or rename the artical to "Joe's seat"
Troy Murphy
12:02 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Sorry I brought the question up, the person I could have asked is currently out of town. I did not mean to cause a flame war was just curious as to what the veiled references were to. Again I am sorry. That being said maybe the school could sell naming rights or have sponsor a seat type fundraiser to help pay for these expenses, I get the impression that sports in Ankeny are taken beyond serious and would therefore generate a lot of needed revenue
Troy Murphy
12:06 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012
William,
Thank you for the link, the next obvious question then is why doesn't Ankeny outsource its snow removal like most other schools so the wouldn't need a Utility vehicle storage garage?
Joe Morr
1:08 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012
To Charlotte, Troy, and William: The seat, an Ankeny watch, sweatshirt, and plaque were given to me by four boys, approved by the principal of the high school, Brenda Colby. I attended games home and away and these lads who become special to my wife and I. One of them even wrote a letter to the Alumni and nominated me to the Hall of Honor and last year I was selected. No, Charlotte I am not just for athletics, I just want kids to get the best education we can provide for them. This is why I returned to Ankeny with our son when he was 12 years old as I knew he would get a great education. William - get it straight please - It is in the school by-laws that one must be dead to get this honor of a seat and I'm only 75 and hope to outlive my great grandfather at 104 and this is why my seat was discontinued. Now you really have the facts not just a bunch of gossip. If you people want to really get to know me let's meet, anywhere, anytime please and I'll answer all your questions to the best of my ability. Troy - I do not know anything about a garage, sorry. Don't knock someone just because they have lived in a town for seven generations and have three great grandchildren the sixth generation to attend Ankeny Schools. I do not care what anyone thinks, l'm very proud of these facts and no one can take them away from me.
William
6:54 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Joe, I'm pretty familiar with the Ankeny school district board policies (our school district doesn't have anything called "by-laws") and haven't seen any mention anywhere of anyone, dead or alive, being given a "seat of honor" at any school event.
Memorials may be established for deceased persons, but no one is ever given a "seat of honor" for any sporting events. The boys did a nice thing for you, but they and Brenda Colby, didn't have the authority to give you or anyone else a reserved seat. That's one of the reasons this "seat of honor" went away. There are other reasons as well but I'm guessing no one wants to hear about them.
Elizabeth
5:52 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012
A word of caution: If you choose to write a letter to the editor and it is published in the Des Moines Register, be prepared for Joe Morr to call you up and give you a piece of his mind. This has happened to 2 close friends of mine, and they felt as though they were being bullied by Mr. Morr so they would not write future letters to the editor.
(Megan -- I can give you both of their names if you need to confirm this is true.)
Regardless of how long one has lived in a community, I don't believe it provides them the right or privilege to intimidate others into subscribing to their opinions.
reggie m
6:09 pm on Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Wheres the money going to come from? Since when does the Ankeny taxpayer have to pay for this. Why don't developers take the risk anymore? In the old days people went and got loans at the banks. Now the developers knock on the doors of City Hall and the School district. That way there is no risk to the developer and it falls in the lap of the taxpayer. Which in turn if it fails the taxpayers get caught paying the bill. If your a developer and you can't even get the funding for your own project. Ankeny and its taxpayers don't need you. If we can keep oir taxes low business will come without asking for a hand out. I salute the many businesses over the years that didn't ask for the hand out. Your are Ankeny! I love sports. I wish people fought about helping our senior citizens, people on disability, people on fixed incomes like we do for our kids fun and enjoyment. You may be surprised what private funding may do for a project like this. One more tid bit of information. Its one thing to bujld something like this but after its built what are the replacement, operating and maintenance costs? Nothing lasts forever.
Bobby
8:25 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012
Don't worry Reggie. The school board over the last six months has single handedly spent every dime remaining. They have no money to build anything after their wreckless oversight. Maybe Elwell will donate several millions to make it all up since he mistakenly paid for their deceitful campaign not to spend so much.
From here on the taxpayers get to vote on every bond -- get out the vote NO billboards!
Joe Morr
10:40 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Reggie - You are right. No one knows how much Denny Elwell has donated to this community as he is one that does not use a blow horn to tell everyone. I know he helped me start a hire a kid project along with V. W. Smith. These kids were hired by people on vacation or needing help where they and the kids came to an agreement on pay. This was one of the great things helping kids work on projects and get paid for them. Bobby - You have a disappointing idea of what this school board have tried to do with the mess they inherited. Please do vote on who you feel will help this community and if you do not, you have no reason to holler. I'll vote today for who I believe is best suited for the city council. I hope to see you at the polls too. My wife and I have been married 57 years in August, are 75 years old, live on a fixed income, both are veterans so the VA hospital helps us out tremendiously. I know Denny Elwell personally and what he did for Deleware gave Ankeny a lot of businesses who pay a lot of tax to help our schools and city.
Amanda P.
11:07 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
The school board is creating their own mess Joe. They can't blame Bush or Obama for their wasteful spending. When times are tough, you don't blow millions to upgrade sports facilities, pay out executive severance packages, vote in huge spending budgets and then ask us to support a bond. King George and the new school board gang have no leadership and are in way over their heads. All one has to do is look at their bad judgement to reach that conclusion.